<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for CrowdVine Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.crowdvine.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by Import from China</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Import from China</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 18:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-270</guid>
		<description>I came across this blog the other day and you got some great info here - thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across this blog the other day and you got some great info here - thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by u24</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>u24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-266</guid>
		<description>number 2, hands down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>number 2, hands down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by Dan Arkind</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Arkind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-265</guid>
		<description>Dude.  you got the name vine.  Find someone who can make a background graphic that looks like vines on latticework (well, ivy on latticework) and put white text on it that says CrowdVine.  

Or find someone who can use a standard font and make a cool vine going through the C - de - ve over the n, etc. - the vine should be subtle and run around the text / through the text.

go organic yo.

dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude.  you got the name vine.  Find someone who can make a background graphic that looks like vines on latticework (well, ivy on latticework) and put white text on it that says CrowdVine.  </p>
<p>Or find someone who can use a standard font and make a cool vine going through the C - de - ve over the n, etc. - the vine should be subtle and run around the text / through the text.</p>
<p>go organic yo.</p>
<p>dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by LOFer</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>LOFer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Number 3 all the way, it has a simple intricacy (??!!) and an inherent joy that is not present in the others.

IMHO of course :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 3 all the way, it has a simple intricacy (??!!) and an inherent joy that is not present in the others.</p>
<p>IMHO of course :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by MissWhiteMoth</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>MissWhiteMoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 07:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-263</guid>
		<description>definitely #3 and #4: both recall to one's mind some of the 'vine' subjects...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definitely #3 and #4: both recall to one&#8217;s mind some of the &#8216;vine&#8217; subjects&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by Jaina</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-262</guid>
		<description>#3 for the win! I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3 for the win! I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by Connie Fries</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie Fries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-261</guid>
		<description>I vote for #2.....Good Luck
Connie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for #2&#8230;..Good Luck<br />
Connie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by naomi</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>naomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-260</guid>
		<description>I love the last one, the third one and the first one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the last one, the third one and the first one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by Virginia</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-259</guid>
		<description>i like #1 but #3 is my favorite. Good luck, let us know which one wins!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like #1 but #3 is my favorite. Good luck, let us know which one wins!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by Dean</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-258</guid>
		<description>Number one is my favorite because it has a spunky simplicity to it. Although, I might use different colors for the wording. The dark gray doesn't seem to fit much. Perhaps you could use the dark green color for Crowd, and the lime green color for Vine. 

Number Two is okay, but it seems somewhat bland. 

Number Three, looks creepy, and loses the simplicity. 

Number Four makes you look like you're an Italian Restaurant, like Olive Garden. In fact, I'm pretty sure that's where that person got their inspiration. 

Number Five is decent in concept, but it makes the last dot over the o look like he's ruining a date between the dots on c and r. Makes the three's a crowd thing, not look positively. 

Good Luck finding one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number one is my favorite because it has a spunky simplicity to it. Although, I might use different colors for the wording. The dark gray doesn&#8217;t seem to fit much. Perhaps you could use the dark green color for Crowd, and the lime green color for Vine. </p>
<p>Number Two is okay, but it seems somewhat bland. </p>
<p>Number Three, looks creepy, and loses the simplicity. </p>
<p>Number Four makes you look like you&#8217;re an Italian Restaurant, like Olive Garden. In fact, I&#8217;m pretty sure that&#8217;s where that person got their inspiration. </p>
<p>Number Five is decent in concept, but it makes the last dot over the o look like he&#8217;s ruining a date between the dots on c and r. Makes the three&#8217;s a crowd thing, not look positively. </p>
<p>Good Luck finding one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by Foxxy_Bott</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Foxxy_Bott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-257</guid>
		<description>I love #3! It's professional, yet stylish.  #2 would have to be my second choice. Very nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love #3! It&#8217;s professional, yet stylish.  #2 would have to be my second choice. Very nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by Ben Finkel</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Finkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-256</guid>
		<description>I think #1 is the best. It's unique and full of character and has a very appealing nature, yet it's still simple. It also feels like a vine and a crowd in a cool way. 

#3 is my second favorite... it's a little farther out, and I'm not sure it totally matches your brand, but it's fun and funky and kinda neat.

#2 is doable, but very conservative and generic. Not bad, but not fabulous. Doesn't say much to me about brand other than "I'm web 2.0". Still could work fine, but won't stand out.

I would vote against #4 or #5. (#4 I like, but I don't think it's a great match for CrowdVine).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think #1 is the best. It&#8217;s unique and full of character and has a very appealing nature, yet it&#8217;s still simple. It also feels like a vine and a crowd in a cool way. </p>
<p>#3 is my second favorite&#8230; it&#8217;s a little farther out, and I&#8217;m not sure it totally matches your brand, but it&#8217;s fun and funky and kinda neat.</p>
<p>#2 is doable, but very conservative and generic. Not bad, but not fabulous. Doesn&#8217;t say much to me about brand other than &#8220;I&#8217;m web 2.0&#8243;. Still could work fine, but won&#8217;t stand out.</p>
<p>I would vote against #4 or #5. (#4 I like, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a great match for CrowdVine).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by Anne</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-255</guid>
		<description>referred by iheartquotes:

I like #'s 5 and 3. 

At first I didn't like 5, but it was because I didn't 'get it' right away. But it made me look longer, and I got the connection of people mingling. It's professional looking but still fun. However, I do get that image of German language 'umlauts' (sp?). 

3 is pleasing and pretty, the people look energetic. This is my second pick. 

BTW, I am a female, 27, midwest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>referred by iheartquotes:</p>
<p>I like #&#8217;s 5 and 3. </p>
<p>At first I didn&#8217;t like 5, but it was because I didn&#8217;t &#8216;get it&#8217; right away. But it made me look longer, and I got the connection of people mingling. It&#8217;s professional looking but still fun. However, I do get that image of German language &#8216;umlauts&#8217; (sp?). </p>
<p>3 is pleasing and pretty, the people look energetic. This is my second pick. </p>
<p>BTW, I am a female, 27, midwest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by Jules</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Jules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-254</guid>
		<description>I like the second one best - to me it's the simplest and yet most eye-catching. The last one is my least favourite as the dots make it look like a foreign language (to me anyway!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the second one best - to me it&#8217;s the simplest and yet most eye-catching. The last one is my least favourite as the dots make it look like a foreign language (to me anyway!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by Brad</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-253</guid>
		<description>#3, then #2. Definitely not #4...the whole rounded-corners-reflection thing is so 2007. And #5 is just WTF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3, then #2. Definitely not #4&#8230;the whole rounded-corners-reflection thing is so 2007. And #5 is just WTF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by aschmitz</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>aschmitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-252</guid>
		<description>I'd have to say #1 or #2. Like the colors better on 2, but the graphic from 1. You'll want a graphic that's recognizable at smaller sizes (favicon, etc.) too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to say #1 or #2. Like the colors better on 2, but the graphic from 1. You&#8217;ll want a graphic that&#8217;s recognizable at smaller sizes (favicon, etc.) too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by Chris Hebert</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-251</guid>
		<description>I love #3 because the design represents people. Very cute, simple, professional looking, and it makes me curious to find out more about the company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love #3 because the design represents people. Very cute, simple, professional looking, and it makes me curious to find out more about the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by tony</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-250</guid>
		<description>One thing on #5 is that it could be easily embellished (for example &lt;a href="http://99designs.com/contests/9106/entries/616307" rel="nofollow"&gt;check out the original version of it&lt;/a&gt;). 

@Morriss, thanks for the compliments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing on #5 is that it could be easily embellished (for example <a href="http://99designs.com/contests/9106/entries/616307" rel="nofollow">check out the original version of it</a>). </p>
<p>@Morriss, thanks for the compliments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by Amanda</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-249</guid>
		<description>If simple is what you are aiming for, I think the last one is best. It's still unique, stands out with the bright green and the accents, but is simple and easily identifiable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If simple is what you are aiming for, I think the last one is best. It&#8217;s still unique, stands out with the bright green and the accents, but is simple and easily identifiable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would you like to redesign CrowdVine? by Renee</title>
		<link>http://blog.crowdvine.com/2008/07/07/would-you-like-to-redesign-crowdvine/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.crowdvine.com/?p=47#comment-248</guid>
		<description>I second "The Ex's" choice: #2 logo doohickey with #3's font. #2 font is dated by at least a couple of decades. The logo emblem still needs some work--it's not placed right, need to integrate better with company name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second &#8220;The Ex&#8217;s&#8221; choice: #2 logo doohickey with #3&#8217;s font. #2 font is dated by at least a couple of decades. The logo emblem still needs some work&#8211;it&#8217;s not placed right, need to integrate better with company name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
